The Madhyamika School
Mahayana Buddhism is divided into two systems of
thought: the Madhyamika and the Yogacara. The Madhyamikas were so called on
account of the emphasis they laid on madhyama-pratipat (the middle view). In
his first sermon at Banaras, the Buddha preached the Middle Path, which is
neither self-mortification nor a life devoted to the pleasures of the senses.
However, the middle path, as advocated by the adherents of the Madhyamika system,
is not quite the same. Here, the middle path stands for the non-acceptance of
the two views concerning existence and non-existence, eternity and
non-eternity, self and non-self, and so on. In short, it advocates neither the
theory of reality nor that of the unreality of the world, but merely of
relativity. It is, however, to be noted that the middle path propounded at
Banaras has an ethical meaning, while that of the Madhyamikas is a metaphysical
concept.
The Madhyamika School is said to have originated with
the teacher, Nagarjuna or Arya Nagarjuna (2nd century CE). He was followed by a
galaxy of Madhyamika thinkers, such as Aryadeva (3rd century CE), Buddhapalita (5th
century CE), Bhavaviveka (5th century CE), Candraklrti (6th century CE) and
Santideva (7th century CE). Nagarjuna wrote a number of works of which the
Madhyamika-karika is regarded as his masterpiece. It presents in a systematic
manner the philosophy of the Madhyamika School. It teaches that sunyata (the
indescribable absolute) is the absolute. There is no difference between samsara
(phenomenal world) and nirvana or sunyata (reality). Sunyata or the absolute
corresponds to the nirguna Brahman of the Upanisads. In the invocation in verse
at the beginning of the work, Nagarjuna gives the fundamentals of his
philosophy in a nutshell. He describes Pratitya-samutpada (Dependent
Origination) by means of eight negatives. ‘There is neither origination nor
cessation, neither permanence nor impermanence, neither unity nor diversity, neither
coming-in nor going-out, in the law of Pratitya-samutpada. Essentially, there
is only non-origination which is equated with sunyata. Elsewhere he also states
that Pratitya-samutpada is called sunyata. Hence sunyata, referring as it does
to non-origination, is in reality the middle path which avoids the two basic
views of existence and non-existence. Sunyata is the relative existence of
things, or a kind of relativity. Prof. Radhakrishnan writes:' ‘By sunyata.
therefore, the Madhyamika does not mean absolute non-being, but relative
being.’ The Madhyamika view holds Sunyata to be the central idea of its
philosophy and is therefore designated the sunyavada. The Madhyamika-karika
further deals with two kinds of truths: samvrti (conventional or empirical truth)
and paramartha (higher or transcendental truth). The former refers to ignorance
or delusion which envelops reality and gives a false impression, while the
latter is the realization that worldly things are non-existent like an illusion
or an echo. Paramiirtha- satya (transcendental truth) cannot be attained
without resorting to samvrti-satya (conventional truth). Samvrti- satya
(conventional truth) is only a means, while paramartha- satya (transcendental
truth) is the end. Thus, viewed from the relative standpoint (samvrti).
Pratitya-samutpada explains worldly phenomena, but looked at from the absolute
standpoint (paramartha), it means non-origination at all times and is equated
with nirvana or sunyata. Towards the beginning of the 5th century CE, the Madhyamika
was divided into two schools of thought: the Prasarigika school and the
Svatantra school. The Prasarigika school uses the method of reductio ad
absurdum to establish its theses, while the Svatantra school employs
independent reasoning. The former was founded by Buddhapalita and the latter by
Bhavaviveka. A study of the Madhyamika works reveals that dialectic is the core
of Madhyamika philosophy. It may be mentioned that the T’ien-t'ai and San-lun
sects of China advocated the doctrine of sunyata and were thus a continuation
of the Indian Madhyamika system. The Sanron sect in Japan also followed this
system.
No comments:
Post a Comment